Friday, June 23, 2017

Paul VI stabbed at Manila International Airport in the Philippines


Benjamín Mendoza y Amor Flores, a Bolivian surrealist painter dressed as a priest, stabs Paul VI twice with a dagger before being subdued by Paul VI’s personal secretary, Fr. Pasquale Macchi, and the infamous Msgr. Paul Marcinkus.
video




Tuesday, June 20, 2017

update on the new member of the Pontifical Academy Of Life — Rabbi Avraham Steinberg, M.D.




Why did Francis appoint two Talmudic Jews to the Pontifical Academy Of Life?  We at Call Me Jorge... believe the answer is a simple one, it is to further the process of Catholics continuing to look towards the rabbi as the ultimate authority in religion, ethics, and morals.  In this post we will focus on Rabbi Avraham Steinberg and his three-volume, Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics.  In two recent posts on twitter, by Maurice Pinay and gem, some of the diabolical insanity of the Talmudic religion contained in this work was exposed.  We have those citations below and several others we found while perusing the encyclopedia.  Keep in mind that Francis looks to Rabbi Avraham Steinberg and Talmudic Judaism as authorities.

According to wikipedia,
Rabbi Professor Avraham Steinberg MD (Hebrew אברהם שטינברג; born 25 August 1947) is a medical ethicist, pediatric neurologist, rabbi and editor of Talmudic literature.
Professor Steinberg is Director of the Medical Ethics Unit at Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, and co-chairman of the Israeli National Council on Bioethics. In 1999 he won the Israel Prize for original Rabbinic literature for his 7-volume Encyclopedia Hilchatit Refuit in Hebrew - the most comprehensive text book ever compiled on this subject. It was translated into English by Professor Fred Rosner as the Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics.[1]
Steinberg is Director of the Torah literature publishing group Yad HaRav Herzog, head of the Editorial Board of the Talmudic Encyclopedia (or Encyclopedia Talmudit) and Editor-in-Chief of the Talmudic Micropedia.



Excerpts from the Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics: by Rabbi Avraham Steinberg, M.D.





















The above is just a small sampling of the demented minds of the rabbis and their man-made traditions.  For our American readers who are worried about Sharia Law, where’s the concern about the Halakhic Law which is entering the Novus Ordo through the back door with Francis’ recent appointments such as this?  In a previous post we showed how Halakha already influences the American courts (see, R.I.P. Antonin ‘Nino’ Gregory Scalia).  Have the rank-and-file pew sitters been processed to the degree where they think that the above is acceptable to their Christian beliefs?  If not where is the outcry from anyone except for a few ‘voices...crying in the wilderness’ (John 1, 23)?


Related:

Monday, June 19, 2017

What was Francis reaction when he read this letter?


Francis and Cardinal Caffarra in a ‘spiritual hug’.


We at Call Me Jorge... wonder what Francis’ reaction was when he read the letter (see below) from Cardinal Carlo Caffarra on 25 April 2017.  We bet that not only did it get his heart going but that he had another outburst filled with profanity. Sandro Magister, who published the Portuguese original, still has his Vatican press credentials, as we write, but he may find himself on the receiving end of the wrath of ‘humble’ Francis once again.  The funniest part is when Caffarra assures Francis that the four cardinals believe Francis is the pope and not to worry they are not sedvacantists!  Anyway you slice it, its the same old Vatican game - a letter to Francis, followed by an explosion of ‘humble’ anger, then Francis pretending as if the letter didn’t exist, and ending with the letter being publicly aired like it was laundry by the frustrated letter writers.  It’s an elaborate ritual of saving face for all parties involved.  Ah, who could have predicted that Amoris Laetitia would become a sideshow at Francis’ macabre carnival?

“Most Holy Father,
It is with a certain trepidation that I address myself to Your Holiness, during these days of the Easter season. I do so on behalf of the Most Eminent Cardinals: Walter Brandmüller, Raymond L. Burke, Joachim Meisner, and myself.
We wish to begin by renewing our absolute dedication and our unconditional love for the Chair of Peter and for Your august person, in whom we recognize the Successor of Peter and the Vicar of Jesus: the “sweet Christ on earth,” as Saint Catherine of Siena was fond of saying. We do not share in the slightest the position of those who consider the See of Peter vacant, nor of those who want to attribute to others the indivisible responsibility of the Petrine munus. We are moved solely by the awareness of the grave responsibility arising from the munus of cardinals: to be advisers of the Successor of Peter in his sovereign ministry. And from the Sacrament of the Episcopate, which “has placed us as bishops to pasture the Church, which He has acquired with his blood” (Acts 20:28).
On September 19, 2016 we delivered to Your Holiness and to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith five dubia, asking You to resolve uncertainties and to bring clarity on some points of the post-synodal Apostolic Exhortation, Amoris Laetitia.
Not having received any response from Your Holiness, we have reached the decision to ask You, respectfully and humbly, for an Audience, together if Your Holiness would like. We attach, as is the practice, an Audience Sheet in which we present the two points we wish to discuss with you.
Most Holy Father,
A year has now gone by since the publication of Amoris Laetitia. During this time, interpretations of some objectively ambiguous passages of the post-synodal Exhortation have publicly been given that are not divergent from, but contrary to, the permanent Magisterium of the Church. Despite the fact that the Prefect of the Doctrine of the Faith has repeatedly declared that the doctrine of the Church has not changed, numerous statements have appeared from individual Bishops, Cardinals, and even Episcopal Conferences, approving what the Magisterium of the Church has never approved. Not only access to the Holy Eucharist for those who objectively and publicly live in a situation of grave sin, and intend to remain in it, but also a conception of moral conscience contrary to the Tradition of the Church. And so it is happening — how painful it is to see this! — that what is sin in Poland is good in Germany, that what is prohibited in the archdiocese of Philadelphia is permitted in Malta. And so on. One is reminded of the bitter observation of B. Pascal: “Justice on this side of the Pyrenees, injustice on the other; justice on the left bank of the river, injustice on the right bank.”
Numerous competent lay faithful, who are deeply in love with the Church and staunchly loyal to the Apostolic See, have turned to their Pastors and to Your Holiness in order to be confirmed in the Holy Doctrine concerning the three sacraments of Marriage, Confession, and the Eucharist. And in these very days, in Rome, six lay faithful, from every Continent, have presented a very well-attended study seminar with the meaningful title: “Bringing clarity.”
Faced with this grave situation, in which many Christian communities are being divided, we feel the weight of our responsibility, and our conscience impels us to ask humbly and respectfully for an Audience.
May Your Holiness remember us in Your prayers, as we pledge to remember You in ours. And we ask for the gift of Your Apostolic Blessing.
Carlo Card. Caffarra
Rome, April 25, 2017
Feast of Saint Mark the Evangelist
*
AUDIENCE SHEET
1. Request for clarification of the five points indicated by the dubia; reasons for this request.
2. Situation of confusion and disorientation, especially among pastors of souls, in primis parish priests.”
sources:  English translation — Edward Pentin, Full Text of Dubia Cardinals’ Letter Asking Pope for an Audience & Portuguese original — Sandro Magister, "A nossa consciência força-nos…"


 Who do these guys think they are?

Another personal video from Francis


This time to the Bishop of Gozo in Malta, Mario Grech, on the occasion of the inauguration of the mosaics of the Sanctuary of the Virgin of Ta 'Pinu.
video


Dear pilgrims,

I accept with joy the invitation to greet all of you who are today assembled at the Shrine of the Virgin of Ta 'Pinu, where a great embrace of mosaics awaits Jesus and his Mother.

The image of the churchyard, which today is inaugurated, lays before our eyes the beauty of a simple contemplative prayer, accessible to all, great and small: the prayer of the holy Rosary. I too often used the Rosary in front of a mosaic: a small mosaic of Our Lady with the Child, where Mary appears in the centre, while in reality, using her hands, she becomes a kind of ladder through which Jesus can descend in the midst of us. The centre is always Jesus, who lowers himself to walk with us men so that we can ascend into Heaven with Him.

In the Rosary prayer we turn to the Virgin Mary to bring us closer to her Son Jesus, to know him and to love him more and more. And while we repeat "Hail Mary," we meditate on the mysteries, the Joyful, luminous, sorrowful and glorious stages of Christ's life, but also of our lives: for we walk with the Lord. This simple prayer, in fact, helps us to contemplate all that God has done for us and for our salvation in his love, and makes us understand that our life is united to that of Christ. In prayer, we are giving everything to God: fatigue, hurt, fears, but also joys, gifts, people ... all to God. By praying, we allow God to enter into our time, to accept and transfigure all that we live. This powerful prayer of the Holy Rosary serves us often because it brings peace to hearts, to families, to the Church, and to the world.

And, please do not forget to pray for me. May the Lord bless you and the Virgin Mother protect you.

John Paul II would have had no problem with Amoris Laetitia


...as he gave communion to the twice divorced, thrice married, and famous Zen-Buddhist playboy conductor, Herbert von Karajan.






By now the five dubia of cardinals Caffarra, Burke, Brandmuller, and Meisner submitted to Francis should been seen for the side-show that they are.  Dubias #2, #4, and #5, all reference John Paul II’s Encyclical "Veritatis Splendor".  Why are they bringing up an encyclical which no one pays attention to, much less the author of it?   What speaks louder, the meaningless words of John Paul II or his actions?  Yes, John Paul II wrote this encyclical several years after the above video but we would bet that John Paul II continued to give communion to divorcees after it was written.  John Paul II never did public penance in reparation for this.  Why are the four cardinals pretending that John Paul II was anything other than a modernist?  This is duplicitous behavior on the part of the four cardinals.  How come none of the conservative religious media have pointed any of this out?



Amoris Laetitia is just another
hermeneutic of continuity!

Sunday, June 18, 2017

Francis is onboard with the noahide program of The Elijah Interfaith Institute


Francis and his Talmudic handler, Abraham Skorka



This video was made under the auspices of The Elijah Interfaith Institute.  This institute was founded in 1996 by the the crypto-haredi rabbi, Alon Goshen-Gottstein who specializes in Talmud, Jewish thought, and interreligious dialogue; and is financed by the the UNESCO agency of the United Nations.  It is headquartered in Jerusalem and its purpose is to make good noahides out of all the myriad of religions in the world.  They believe that all idol-worship (including what passes for Christianity today) is okay as long as it is subordinate to Talmudic Judaism.  The Elijah Interfaith Institute is also heavily into mysticism and the occult.

Notice in the video the mentions of:
  • dialogue — the code word for the one-way street with the Novus Ordo goose-stepping to the dictates of the Talmudic Jews;
  • criticism of authority — in the Talmudic religion this means correcting God’s errors;
  • ongoing projects of Francis & Skorka;
  • Francis learned to be a better Catholic through dialogue — study of the blasphemous Talmud and satanic Kabbalah;
  • encounter — two facets of which were explained so well by the triple agent con-man, Malachi Martin, this means inviting rabbis to teach their false doctrines at Catholic schools and destroy Roman Catholic Hebraeophobia;
  • Francis has preached in Skorka’s synagogue twice — put on your surprise face, as Francis regularly celebrates Talmudic holidays;
  • Francis’ friendship with Skorka made him richer because the rabbi explained the answers to his religious questions — Francis mentions specifically, revelation;
  • the pair are a model of where dialogue can take one — straight to apostasy!;
  • they believe God is responsible for their friendship and dialogue; and
  • neither one of them has attempted to convert the other one — Francis doesn’t need to convert, as he’s a walking talking blasphemous rabbi who is regularly uttering heresies.

This video and the remaining twenty produced by The Elijah Interfaith Institute are anti-Catholic in the highest sense of the word.  Taken together they preach a form of gnostic perennialism under the umbrella of the rabbinic talmudists.  This goes against what Francis is supposed to be representing on earth as the ‘Vicar of Christ’.
“Bear not the yoke with unbelievers. For what participation hath justice with injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath the faithful with the unbeliever? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the living God; as God saith: I will dwell in them, and walk among them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore, Go out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing: And I will receive you; and I will be a Father to you; and you shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.”
source: The Second Epistle to the Corinthians 6, 14-18

Let’s return for a few minutes to The Elijah Interfaith Institute.  The name of the institute is a very interesting one.  For Catholics, in the Old Testament (see Kings) the prophet Elias was opposed to idol worship and the prophets of Baal.  Talmudic Judaism sees Elijah in quite a different manner.

Talmudists believe that Elijah witnesses the bris (brit milah or circumcision) the seal of the old covenant (which has been superseded by the New Covenant).
“Since medieval times, when a brit milah is performed, a chair is set aside for Elijah, the “Angel of the Covenant,” who is believed to be present at every brit milah.”
source: Geoffrey W. Dennis, “The Encyclopedia of Jewish Myth, Magic and Mysticism” e-book, p. 119

He also makes an ‘appearance’ at the anti-Christian Seder Meal:
Another ritual involving cursing the Gentiles is the famous custom of reciting "Pour Out Thy Wrath" (Shefokh hamatkha) at the Passover seder ... It's earliest mention appears in Mahzor Vitry ... This section of the [Passover] Haggadah is understood by the participants as closely connected with the future Redemption. Opening the door to the prophet Elijah in tandem with the prayer for vengeance signifies a connection between vengeance against the Gentiles and the appearance of the Messiah. It should also be noted that this section of the Haggadah is recited as an introduction to the fourth and last cup of wine, the cup of deliverance ...
[...]
The messianic content of "Pour Out Thy Wrath" was illustrated in illuminated Ashkenazic Haggadot through pictures depicting the Messiah riding on a donkey with Elijah by his side, proclaiming his coming. [Antonius] Margarita ... relates the popular Jewish exegesis of the Messiah's donkey ...
I think that I myself sincerely believed the lies told below. Blessed be God and the Holy Spirit, who saved me from such and other errors. According to the lies of the Jews, when the Messiah comes he will ride upon an ass and seat all Jews upon the ass, while all Christians will sit on the ass's tail. Then the Messiah will ride with all his passengers into the sea, and when he comes to the depths of the sea, the donkey will drop its tail and all the Christians will fall into the sea and drown. And indeed, this will have to be a very big ass. But an even bigger ass is a person who believes such things! (Antonius Margarita, Ein kurner Bericht und Anzaigung [Wien, 1541], fol. IIv).
source: Two Nations in Your Womb - Israel Jacob Yuval, pp.123-125

Talmudists believe that Elijah teaches that non-Jews don’t have souls:


source: The Talmud, The Steinsaltz Edition, Tractate Bava Metzia 114b

Elijah announces to the rabbis that they have defeated God:
...when Rabbi Yehoshua refused to heed the heavenly voice. Elijah the Prophet responded, “God smiled and said, ‘My sons have defeated me! My sons have defeated me!’” In Hebrew, the echoing sentence is “Nitzjuni banai! Nitzjuni banai!”
source: The Common, Talmudic Lesson: God’s Smile

The Talmudic rabbis teach that Elijah blamed God for Israel’s apostasy and God thought Elijah correct:


source: Pious Irreverence: Confronting God in Rabbinic Judaism by Dov Weiss, p. 70

Elijah is thought to be the teacher of secret doctrines (Kabbalah) to the rabbis:
The mystics and cabalists of all times frequently appealed to Elijah as their patron. Among them was the gaon Joseph, of whom it was said that Elijah was a daily visitor at his academy (First Epistle of Sherira, ed. Neubauer, p. 32). The introduction of the Cabala to Provence is traced directly to Elijah, who revealed the secret doctrine to Jacob ha-Nozer. Similarly Abraham b. Isaac and Abraham ben David of Posquières are mentioned as privileged ones, to whom Elijah appeared (see Jellinek, "Auswahl Kabbalistischer Mystik," pp. 4, 5). The pseudonymous author of the "Ḳanah" asserted that he had received his teachings directly from Elijah. In the Zohar, Simon ben Yoḥai and his son Eleazar are mentioned as among those who enjoyed the special friendship of Elijah. This work, as well as the Tiḳḳun Zohar and the Zohar Ḥadash, contains muchthat is ascribed to Elijah (compare Friedmann, "Seder Eliyahu Rabba we-Seder Eliyahu Zuṭa," pp. 38-41). When, toward the middle of the fourteenth century, the Cabala received new prominence in Palestine, Elijah again took a leading part. Joseph de la Regna asks Elijah's advice in his combat with Satan. The father of the new cabalistic school, Isaac Luria, was visited by Elijah before his son was born. In like manner, the father of Israel Ba'al Shem-Ṭob received the good news from Elijah that a son would be born unto him, "who would be a light in Israel" ("Ma'asiyyot Peliot," pp. 24, 25, Cracow, 1896, which contains an interesting narrative of Elijah's meeting with the father of Ba'al Shem-Ṭob).
source: Jewish Encylopedia (1906), Volume 5, pp. 125-6, entry ELIJAH ()

We could go on but we believe the reader has an idea of what the Elijah of the Talmudic Jews represents and that he has little to do with the prophet Elias of the Old Testament.  Is it beginning to sink in how bad Francis and his rabbinical buddies are?

Below are the religious leaders who made videos for The Elijah Interfaith Institute.  It’s a motley crew of anti-Christs who all long to see the contrivances of the Talmudic rabbis implemented through the nightmare of noahidism.

  • Grand Mufti Shawki Allam
  • Ven. Chân Không
  • H.H. the Dalai Lama
  • Swami Chidananda
  • Dharma Master Hsin Tao
  • Pope Francis
  • Chief Rabbi David Lau
  • Ven. Khandro Rinpoche
  • Swami Suhitananda
  • Sri Sri Ravi Shankar
  • Rabbi Abraham Skorka
  • Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I
  • Mata Amritanandamayi (Amma)
  • Ayatollah Sayyid Fadhel Al-Milani
  • Imam Dr. Adamou Ndam Njoya
  • Ayatollah Sayyid Hassan Al-Qazwini
  • Archbishop Antje Jackelén
  • Archbishop Justin Welby
  • Shaykh Hamza Yusuf
  • Bhai Sahib Mohinder Singh
  • Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
  • Swami Ramdev

Excerpts from the above mentioned videos.


What Francis can learn from the Talmudic Jews


‘Solve et coagula’ the past and the present



Has Francis taken this advice?